Stimulus:
Response: In the Jewish Illuminati international banker era 1913-present we have dealt with a recurring issue - namely, that of advocacy in and defense of positive liberty (aka license) versus negative liberty (aka liberty) in the public square, which is played out in public policy academia business and the like. Jewish (leftist) groups advocate positive liberty for minority and foreign interests at the expense of the [white] majority here in America and in Europe, wherever the land is industrialized and working fine. The predicate of that subject is to set the industrialized states back to a pastoralized state, such as is the case with and state of places/lands/countries from which the ethnic minorities in the industrialized world on whose behalf Jews (leftists) advocate hail.
The Jews want us to be like the ethnic minorities who come to our lands - set back in time to the Stone Age. Jews controlling our money and media want to infiltrate our lands and push us back to a devolved state of industry and civility, a case in which they import barbarism and cultural norms not supportive of precision and integrity required for advanced civilization.
Another way to frame the argument is liberty v power. The Jews use money and media/culture paradigm influence to increase their power. Concomitantly, they undermine the defenses and power of the white European peoples in the industrialized world to increase dependence - of the sensitivity and vulnerability varieties - of us and therefore to increase their own relative power. In this way, we can veritably define our dilemma as an age old one of liberty versus power and slavery versus freedom.
Jews and their Muslim cohorts support slavery. To circle back to a historical point that is played endlessly in academia and television and newspaper (((MSM))) broadcasting, the transatlantic slave trade in North (Anglo) America was facilitated by the big banks of Europe at the time - in the main, Rothschild’s family at the nexus of Bank of England. We know the Jews like Rothschild and the bankers have a penchant for slavery. Also the Muslims whose unlimited immigration into the West they support have the same penchant for slavery - it is practiced in human trafficking and other forms currently as well as in recent history (cf Barbary Pirate wars).
This debate over ‘discrimination’ is a new skin on an old problem - Middle Eastern folk are making a positive case (by indicting self-defense) for slavery in terms of license, the absence of which via self-defense they characterize as ‘discrimination’.